Erased De Kooning Rauschenberg. Rauschenberg called the piece “the erased de kooning drawing.” this act of erasure was a poetic way of having pop art succeed abstract expressionism. In 1953, robert rauschenberg erased an art piece created by the abstract expressionist willem de kooning.
Through first impressions, its meaning is utterly opaque, and is impossible to speculate upon. He framed the erased drawing within a simple, gilded frame, with a mat bearing an inscription typed by jasper johns that identified the significance of the seemingly empty paper. At the bottom, a nameplate is cut into the mat giving us the first crumb of information to piece together the mysterious, haunting void of the paper.
Erased De Kooning Drawing Artist Name Robert Rauschenberg Date Created 1953 Classification Drawing Medium/Media Traces Of Drawing Media On Paper With Label And Gilded Frame Dimensions 25 1/4 In.
“this is a very important work of art,” benezra said. Rauschenberg’s later combinatory formats suspend these. De kooning was, unsurprisingly, less than enthused at the request.
In 1953, Robert Rauschenberg Erased An Art Piece Created By The Abstract Expressionist Willem De Kooning.
Robert rauschenberg’s erased de kooning drawing is, as its title suggests, an erased drawing. Reportedly, it took rauschenberg over a month to remove most of the marks from the paper. The concept of destroying, or altering, a famous work of art was an approach rauschenberg himself employed and explored with his 1953 erased.
Rauschenberg Has Said That He Was “Trying To Find A Way To Bring Drawing.
In 1953, rauschenberg visited his famous colleague willem de kooning in his studio and asked him for a drawing, because he wanted to erase an important work. de kooning agreed and selected a. “i remember that the idea of destruction kept coming into the conversation, and i kept trying to show that it wouldn’t be destruction,” said rauschenberg, “although there was always the chance that if it didn’t work out there would be a terrible waste.” as the younger artist further elucidated his intentions over. It was this acknowledged worth which made de kooning’s work fitting for rauschenberg’s needs.
Rauschenberg First Tried Erasing His Own Drawings But Ultimately Decided That In Order For The Experiment To Succeed He Had To Begin With An Artwork That Was Undeniably Significant In Its Own Right.
Rauschenberg may have done the final act but de kooning decided the base piece. Through the erasure of de kooning's drawing, rauschenberg acknowledged his admiration for his predecessor, but also signaled a movement away from abstract expressionism. Moreover, its aesthetic quality can be readily associated with minimalist abstraction (though rauschenberg was not himself a minimalist), an art movement widely interpreted as a reaction against abstract expressionism.
64.1 × 55.2 × 1.3 Cm.
Towards the end of the interview when asked how. “i felt it was a legitimate work of art, created by the technique of. ‘4’33’ is a musical score in three movements, exactly 4 minutes and 33 seconds long, that consists only of silence (or, technically, pauses).
